Home Page

Press Releases

 

 

 

Home

Annual Books

Awards Online

Press Releases

Help/Info

About Us/Contact

Which State Is Healthiest?

News Media Link

See Rankings Below or Click on These Links for More Information:

Click Here for the Complete 2005 Healthiest State Awards Publication

Press Release | Factors | MQ Home

Healthiest State Rankings 1993 to 2005 | Methodology | About Us

 

#1 ranking is healthiest; #50 rankings is least healthy

2005 HEALTHIEST STATE

ALPHA ORDER

RANK ORDER

2005 RANK STATE SUM 2004 RANK CHANGE 2005 RANK STATE SUM 2004 RANK CHANGE
41 Alabama -9.97 47 6   1 Vermont 22.67 2 1
37 Alaska -4.98 35 -2   2 New Hampshire 21.4 1 -1
39 Arizona -5.78 40 1   3 Massachusetts 18.69 8 5
40 Arkansas -5.93 38 -2   4 Minnesota 16.3 5 1
18 California 6.51 14 -4   5 Maine 16.06 9 4
27 Colorado 1.61 27 0   6 Iowa 14.57 4 -2
10 Connecticut 12.63 10 0   7 Utah 14.19 6 -1
35 Delaware -1.49 44 9   8 Hawaii 13.71 3 -5
44 Florida -11.21 41 -3   9 Nebraska 12.82 7 -2
42 Georgia -10 42 0   10 Connecticut 12.63 10 0
8 Hawaii 13.71 3 -5   11 North Dakota 11.47 12 1
20 Idaho 5.42 20 0   12 Rhode Island 10.51 18 6
34 Illinois -1.17 31 -3   13 Washington 9.87 13 0
24 Indiana 3.33 28 4   14 Wisconsin 8.07 21 7
6 Iowa 14.57 4 -2   15 Kansas 7.85 17 2
15 Kansas 7.85 17 2   16 New Jersey 7.71 11 -5
32 Kentucky -0.86 29 -3   17 Virginia 6.74 22 5
50 Louisiana -20.95 48 -2   18 California 6.51 14 -4
5 Maine 16.06 9 4   19 Oregon 5.92 15 -4
29 Maryland 0.77 32 3   20 Idaho 5.42 20 0
3 Massachusetts 18.69 8 5   21 Pennsylvania 5.33 26 5
23 Michigan 3.73 25 2   22 South Dakota 5.29 19 -3
4 Minnesota 16.3 5 1   23 Michigan 3.73 25 2
49 Mississippi -18.43 50 1   24 Indiana 3.33 28 4
36 Missouri -2.89 37 1   25 Montana 3.19 23 -2
25 Montana 3.19 23 -2   26 Ohio 3.12 24 -2
9 Nebraska 12.82 7 -2   27 Colorado 1.61 27 0
47 Nevada -13.37 45 -2   28 West Virginia 1.23 34 6
2 New Hampshire 21.4 1 -1   29 Maryland 0.77 32 3
16 New Jersey 7.71 11 -5   30 Wyoming -0.19 16 -14
48 New Mexico -17.69 49 1   31 New York -0.64 33 2
31 New York -0.64 33 2   32 Kentucky -0.86 29 -3
33 North Carolina -1.03 30 -3   33 North Carolina -1.03 30 -3
11 North Dakota 11.47 12 1   34 Illinois -1.17 31 -3
26 Ohio 3.12 24 -2   35 Delaware -1.49 44 9
46 Oklahoma -12.07 39 -7   36 Missouri -2.89 37 1
19 Oregon 5.92 15 -4   37 Alaska -4.98 35 -2
21 Pennsylvania 5.33 26 5   38 Tennessee -5 36 -2
12 Rhode Island 10.51 18 6   39 Arizona -5.78 40 1
43 South Carolina -10.63 46 3   40 Arkansas -5.93 38 -2
22 South Dakota 5.29 19 -3   41 Alabama -9.97 47 6
38 Tennessee -5 36 -2   42 Georgia -10 42 0
45 Texas -11.85 42 -3   43 South Carolina -10.63 46 3
7 Utah 14.19 6 -1   44 Florida -11.21 41 -3
1 Vermont 22.67 2 1   45 Texas -11.85 42 -3
17 Virginia 6.74 22 5   46 Oklahoma -12.07 39 -7
13 Washington 9.87 13 0   47 Nevada -13.37 45 -2
28 West Virginia 1.23 34 6   48 New Mexico -17.69 49 1
14 Wisconsin 8.07 21 7   49 Mississippi -18.43 50 1
30 Wyoming -0.19 16 -14   50 Louisiana -20.95 48 -2
METHODOLOGY--The Healthiest State designation is awarded based on 21 factors chosen from the year 2005 edition of our annual reference book, Health Care State Rankings. These factors reflect access to health care providers, affordability of health care and a generally healthy population.  All 21 factors are the same as last year. The 21 factors were divided into two groups: those that are “negative” for which a high ranking would be considered bad for a state, and those that are “positive” for which a high ranking would be considered good for a state. Rates for each of the 21 factors were processed through a formula that measures how a state compares to the national average for a given category. The positive and negative nature of each factor was taken into account as part of the formula. Once these computations were made, the factors then were weighted (factors were weighted equally.) These weighted scores were then added together to get a state’s final score (“SUM” on the table above.) This way, states are assessed based on how they stack up against the national average. The end result is that the farther below the national average a state’s health ranking is, the lower (and less healthy) it ranks. The farther above the national average, the higher (and healthier) a state ranks. This same methodology was used for our Safest/Most Dangerous State and Safest/Most Dangerous City Awards.

The table above shows how each state fared in the 2005 Healthiest State Award as well as its placement in 2004.